Coverage
What other people have written about the work.
Three organisations in UK higher education have written about Edugrade AI independently of us. Their articles are linked below, in their own words, on their own sites.
Coverage
Written about elsewhere.
Independent writing on Edugrade AI from the sector — Jisc, Advance HE and Queen Mary University of London. These are their words, not ours, and each link opens on their site.
Published under the product's earlier name, EduMark AI.
-
Jisc · National Centre for AI
EduMark AI: a generative AI marking and feedback solution from London South Bank University (opens on Jisc's website)
An account of the marking and feedback tool and the work behind it at London South Bank University.
-
Advance HE
EduMark AI: rethinking assessment and feedback with ethical AI (opens on Advance HE's website)
How the tool approaches assessment and feedback, and the ethical questions that shaped it.
-
Queen Mary University of London · Centre for Excellence in AI in Education
Delivering rubric-aligned, real-time feedback with EduMark AI (opens on Queen Mary University of London's website)
On aligning generated feedback to the rubric so it arrives while it is still useful to the student.
-
Queen Mary University of London · Centre for Excellence in AI in Education
Marking is not feedback: reflections on AI, context, and keeping the human in the loop (opens on Queen Mary University of London's website)
On the difference between a mark and useful feedback, and why the educator has to stay in the loop.
Bring us your process.
In a free 30-minute discovery call we will look at how it works today, where the manual effort sits, what is worth automating, what is not, and where people should stay in the loop. No technical brief, no budget, no obligation.